@HansPereit @IuliiaMendel Since there are only two things that can be done, they would have to eventually zero on them:
1. Total blockade of russia: no trade of any kind, no movement of capital or people, no tourism, no overflight, just an iron wall.
2. Weapons for Ukraine. Everything we can produce.— Dorin Cheptea (@DorinCheptea) Nov 26, 2025
Day: November 25, 2025
@AngusinCanada @Bricktop_NAFO Oh yeah, they’ve lost a million men fighting a tiny nation that’s had very limited weapons sent to them over the course of 3 years. Russia couldn’t take Ukraine on day one. Ukraine repelled their special forces at the airport and the battle lines are mostly unchanged for 3 years
— Military Arms (@MAC_Arms) Nov 26, 2025
@ThePatriotOasis If so, it’s because Zelensky has no choice but to admit defeat and agreed for Trump threatened to end the supply of weapons. Without the needed weapons, how to defend Ukraine? Surrendering is a matter of “when” not option if no help coming.
— Calvin Lee (@usprotec) Nov 26, 2025
@ElifNull @rshereme Ukraine agreed to give up its nuclear weapons in exchange for a U.S. promise to protect them from Russia. Now Russia is attacking, and the U.S. isn’t honoring the commitment.
— Sir Top Gap (@DealWithTheBens) Nov 26, 2025
@DC_Draino I believe the “No NATO for Ukraine” thing was part of a larger agreement that got Ukraine to give up their nuclear weapons after the fall of the USSR.
— Mike Brannian (@simimike72) Nov 26, 2025
We owe Ukraine for agreeing to disarm and turn over its nuclear weapons. In exchange we promised to protect them from Russia.
— DogPerson! (@dog_person20) November 26, 2025