Posts – russianworld.net - The Russian World

The Gusinsky’s Revenge, Part 2

Post author By Mike Nova
Post date September 9, 2025
Sticky post

Selected Posts: Gusinsky, Lesin, and the FBI: The Goose and his Revenge: The Investigation in tweets

November 15, 2025

The Gusinsky’s Revenge

Part 2 | Part 1

The Investigation in tweets

The Deus ex machina

Gusinsky and Lesin – GS

Vladimir Gusinsky and Mikhail Lesin were two influential Russian media figures involved in the post-Soviet media landscape. Gusinsky, a prominent media mogul and founder of the NTV television network, had a contentious relationship with the Kremlin and ultimately fled Russia. Lesin, a former press minister and media advisor to the Kremlin, was instrumental in shaping the state-controlled media and played a key role in developing the industry. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

Here’s a breakdown of their roles and interactions:

Vladimir Gusinsky: [1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]

Media Mogul: Gusinsky was a highly successful businessman who founded NTV, the first major independent television network in Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Controversial Figure:His media outlets were critical of the government, leading to ongoing conflict with the Kremlin and President Vladimir Putin.
Fled Russia: After facing criminal charges and pressure from the government, Gusinsky was forced to flee Russia in 2000.
Later Life: He continued to be involved in media, though his influence in Russia diminished.

Mikhail Lesin: [1, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24]

Government Official and Advisor:Lesin served as Russia’s Minister of Press, Television, and Radio, and later as an advisor to President Putin.
Shaped State Media: He played a significant role in establishing and controlling state-aligned media, often working to consolidate power and promote the Kremlin’s agenda.
Controversial Figure: Like Gusinsky, Lesin was a complex and controversial figure, with critics accusing him of suppressing media freedom.
Mysterious Death: Lesin died in 2015 under circumstances that remain debated, with some sources attributing his death to natural causes and others suggesting foul play.

Key Interaction: [1, 25]

Gusinsky and Lesin’s paths crossed when Lesin was in a position of power within the government and Gusinsky was a target. Lesin was instrumental in the crackdown on independent media, including NTV, and ultimately contributed to the decline of Gusinsky’s media empire.

In essence, Gusinsky represented the struggle for independent media in Russia, while Lesin represented the state’s efforts to control the narrative. [1, 26, 27, 28]

AI responses may include mistakes.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Putin

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Gusinsky

[3] https://www.themoscowtimes.com/archive/the-mysterious-death-of-the-man-behind-putins-media-machine

[4] https://www.seattletimes.com/opinion/putin-gives-a-master-class-on-why-autocrats-control-the-media/

[5] https://www.npr.org/transcripts/147653086

[6] https://www.themoscowtimes.com/archive/the-mysterious-death-of-the-man-behind-putins-media-machine

[7] https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/11/us/former-putin-aide-found-in-washington-died-from-blows-to-head.html

[8] https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-lesin-us-lawsuit/26520469.html

[9] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/mar/16/mikhail-lesin-putin-adviser-death-washington-neck-fracture

[10] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUEPjzNJqRg

[11] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRBMyCkDNGM

[12] https://www.rferl.org/a/33503187.html

[13] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUEPjzNJqRg

[14] https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/russia-s-interference-in-the-us-judiciary-2/

[15] https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnhyatt/2022/03/18/meet-the-man-who-whispers-in-putins-ear/

[16] https://www.britannica.com/money/Vladimir-Gusinsky

[17] https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/11/us/former-putin-aide-found-in-washington-died-from-blows-to-head.html

[18] https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-lesin-us-lawsuit/26520469.html

[19] https://www.dw.com/en/former-russian-press-minister-mikhail-lesin-dies-in-washington/a-18833676

[20] https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/11/06/russian-lesin-dead-washington-hotel-millionaire/75333508/

[21] https://www.britannica.com/money/Vladimir-Gusinsky

[22] https://www.themoscowtimes.com/archive/the-mysterious-death-of-the-man-behind-putins-media-machine

[23] https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-11-08/controversial-russian-media-mogul-found-dead-in-washington/6921822

[24] https://qz.com/637243/the-mysterious-death-of-a-putin-crony-is-now-blamed-on-blunt-force-injuries-of-the-head

[25] https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Vladimir_Gusinsky

[26] https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/11/us/former-putin-aide-found-in-washington-died-from-blows-to-head.html

[27] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRBMyCkDNGM

[28] https://www.themoscowtimes.com/archive/the-mysterious-death-of-the-man-behind-putins-media-machine

–

At the FBI’s request, Gusinsky’s U.S. visa was revoked in 2022. He subsequently left the United States for Israel in January 2023, the day after McGonigal’s arrest. – Google Search google.com/search?q=At+the+F… It is accurate that Russian-born media mogul Vladimir Gusinsky’s U.S. visa waiver was revoked in 2022 at the FBI’s request, and he subsequently left for Israel in January 2023, the day after former FBI agent Charles McGonigal was arrested. Gusinsky was never charged with a crime but drew FBI scrutiny for his connection to McGonigal. [1, 2, 3] Key details of Gusinsky’s departure: • Visa revocation In 2022, the FBI requested the cancellation of Gusinsky’s visa waiver. This happened afte

twitter.com

6h

share.google/aimode/P3zIVnbd… Business ties: According to Gusinsky’s ex-wife, he frequently boasted of having strong ties to the FBI. This connection began in the 1990s when he hired a Washington communications firm to build relationships in U.S. political circles. Revoked visa: At the FBI’s request, Gusinsky’s U.S. visa was revoked in 2022. He subsequently left the United States for Israel in January 2023, the day after McGonigal’s arrest. No charges filed: Despite the scrutiny and investigation into his finances, Gusinsky has not been charged with any crime related to the McGonigal case.

twitter.com

6h

Gusinsky and the FBI – Google Search google.com/search?q=Gusinsky… As of 2025, Russian oligarch Vladimir Gusinsky is under scrutiny by the FBI due to his connections to former top FBI agent Charles McGonigal. While Gusinsky has not been charged with a crime, agents have questioned his former wife and employees about their relationship. [1, 2, 3, 4] Context of the FBI scrutiny • McGonigal’s conviction: Charles McGonigal, the former head of counterintelligence in the FBI’s New York office, pleaded guilty to sanctions evasion and money laundering. McGonigal was later sentenced to four years in prison. • Associates’ involvement: McGonigal’s indictment was linked to Sergei Shestakov, a former Rus

twitter.com

6h

Was the Mikhail Lesin suspicious death in 2015 investigated by the Washington , D.C. police or the FBI? – Google Search google.com/search?q=Was+the+… – Was the Mikhail Lesin suspicious death in 2015 investigated by the Washington , D.C. police or the FBI? Both the Washington D.C. police and the FBI were involved in the investigation into the 2015 death of Russian media executive Mikhail Lesin. Here is a breakdown of their roles: D.C. Metropolitan Police Department (MPD): The MPD initially conducted the death investigation, as the body was found in a hotel in its jurisdiction. FBI: The FBI assisted the MPD and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia throughout the investigatio

twitter.com

6h

Under what circumstances does the FBI usually reopen the suspicious death cases? – Google Search google.com/search?q=Under+wh… Mistakes in the original investigation: If evidence surfaces that indicates the original investigation was botched or inadequate, a new inquiry may be warranted. – The FBI is generally not the primary investigator for suspicious death cases, which are typically handled by state and local authorities. The FBI will only open or reopen an investigation in limited circumstances that fall under federal jurisdiction or when local agencies specifically request assistance. [1, 2, 3] New and compelling evidence A case can be reopened, regardless of how long ago it was closed,

twitter.com

6h

Office of Public Affairs | Investigation into the Death of Mikhail Lesin Has Closed | United States Department of Justice justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/… Manner of Death Determined an Accident The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, with assistance from the FBI, have concluded a comprehensive investigation into the death last year of Mikhail Lesin, 57, a Russian political figure, media executive and adviser to Vladimir Putin, the President of Russia. As a result of the almost year-long investigation, the Chief Medical Examiner of the District of Columbia has amended Lesin’s manner of death from “undetermined” to “accident” with acut

twitter.com

7h

Office of Public Affairs | Investigation into the Death of Mikhail Lesin Has Closed | United States Department of Justice justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/…

twitter.com

7h

Was the Mikhail Lesin suspicious death in 2015 investigated by the Washington , D.C. police or the FBI? – Google Search google.com/search?q=Was+the+… The joint investigation was concluded in October 2016. At that time, the D.C. Chief Medical Examiner changed the manner of death from “undetermined” to “accident,” citing blunt force injuries from falls and acute ethanol intoxication. However, this finding has been disputed by others, and Lesin’s death continues to be a subject of speculation.

twitter.com

7h

Was the Mikhail Lesin suspicious death in 2015 investigated by the Washington , D.C. police or the FBI? – Google Search google.com/search?q=Was+the+…

twitter.com

7h

Why the FBI does not open the case of the suspicious death of Mikhail Lesin? – Google Search google.com/search?q=Why+the+… AI Overview . After assisting the Metropolitan Police Department and the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the FBI helped determine that Lesin’s death was an accident and the case was officially closed in October 2016.The FBI is not investigating the death of Mikhail Lesin because its involvement ended with the conclusion of the official investigationDetails from the official investigation:Initial findings: Lesin was found dead in a Washington, D.C. hotel room on November 5, 2015, with blunt force injuries to his head, neck, and torso. The initial manner of death was ruled “undete

twitter.com

7h

Why the FBI does not reopen the case of the suspicious death of Mikhail Lesin? – Google Search google.com/search?q=Why+the+… Despite the rumors and counter-claims, without new official evidence, the FBI is unlikely to reopen a case that has been officially closed and ruled an accident. – The FBI has not reopened the case of Mikhail Lesin’s death because the official investigation, which it assisted, concluded his death was an accident. In 2016, following a year-long investigation, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the D.C. Medical Examiner ruled that Lesin died from blunt force injuries sustained during a series of falls in his hotel room while he was severely intox

twitter.com

7h

Was Charles McGonigal the FBI official who ruled the Mikhail Lesin’s suspicious death the “accident” in October 2016? – Google Search google.com/search?q=Was+Char…

twitter.com

7h

Vladimir Gusinsky and the suspicious death of Mikhail Lesin – Google Search google.com/search?q=Vladimir… While both figures were involved in power dynamics within Russia that ended with Gusinsky’s exile and Lesin’s death, there is no publicly available information or credible report suggesting a connection between Vladimir Gusinsky and the events surrounding Mikhail Lesin’s suspicious death.

twitter.com

7h

Vladimir Gusinsky and Mikhail Lesin – Google Search google.com/search?q=Vladimir… In 2000, Lesin presented Gusinsky with the “shares-for-freedom” deal that led to the takeover of Gusinsky’s media empire. Lesin later helped found the Kremlin’s international propaganda network, RT. – Vladimir Gusinsky and Mikhail Lesin .Vladimir Gusinsky is a Russian media magnate who was forced into exile by Vladimir Putin’s government, with the help of former Kremlin media czar Mikhail Lesin, who later died under mysterious circumstances Vladimir Gusinsky Forced exile: Gusinsky, once one of Russia’s most influential businessmen, founded Russia’s first private TV channel, NTV. After his media outlets began ai

twitter.com

7h

In 2000, Lesin presented Gusinsky with the “shares-for-freedom” deal that led to the takeover of Gusinsky’s media empire – Google Search google.com/search?q=In+2000%… – Yes, in 2000, Russia’s Press Minister Mikhail Lesin presented media magnate Vladimir Gusinsky with a “shares-for-freedom” deal that led to the takeover of Gusinsky’s Media-Most empire by the state-controlled energy giant Gazprom. [1, 2, 3] Here’s how the deal unfolded: • Political pressure and arrest: After Vladimir Putin’s election as president in May 2000, the Kremlin targeted Gusinsky, whose media holdings—including the independent NTV television network—had been critical of the government. Gusinsky was arrested in June 20

twitter.com

7h

share.google/aimode/3mK5I77m… In 2000, Lesin presented Gusinsky with the “shares-for-freedom” deal that led to the takeover of Gusinsky’s media empire – .Yes, in 2000, Mikhail Lesin presented the “shares-for-freedom” deal to Vladimir Gusinsky, which led to the state-controlled takeover of Gusinsky’s independent media conglomerate, Media-Most Details of the deal: The offer During his imprisonment in June 2000 on politically motivated fraud charges, Gusinsky was visited by Lesin, who was then Russia’s Press Minister. Lesin offered Gusinsky his freedom and the dropping of all criminal charges in exchange for selling Media-Most to Gazprom-Media, the media arm of the state-controlled natural gas

twitter.com

7h

Suspicious Minds: Medical Experts Cast Doubt On Lesin Autopsy rferl.org/a/of-suspicious-mi… The autopsy report obtained by RFE/RL following more than two years of litigation over Freedom Of Information Act requests is incomplete; some pages are heavily redacted; signatures are whited out. But the details of laboratory results, observations by pathologists from the chief medical examiner’s office and Georgetown University hospital, and an unidentified forensic anthropologist are included in relatively precise detail. – “I’ve done 12,000 autopsies over my career,” said Donald Jason, a forensic pathology consultant and retired professor from Wake Forest University School of Medicine in North Ca

twitter.com

8h

Featured Posts My Opinion – The News And Times

ATACMS Strike in Russia

Post author By Mike Nova
Post date November 19, 2024
Sticky post

Ukraine’s First-Ever ATACMS Strike in Russia, Explained | WSJ

–

ATACMS Strike in Russia

Russia and Ukraine

Ukraine war latest: Zelensky claims Putin drafting 300,000 troops to seize territory – The Independent

Post author By Mike Nova
Post date August 23, 2026

Ukraine war latest: Zelensky claims Putin drafting 300,000 troops to seize territory The Independent

Russia and Ukraine

Ukraine Strikes Radars, Drone Sites in Crimea and Belgorod

Post author By Mike Nova
Post date August 23, 2026

The Ukrainian military confirmed overnight strikes on an “ST-68” radar in Yevpatoria and naval drone facilities in Chornomorske.

Trump and Russia

‘You want names? I’ll give you names’: Kash Patel drops Epstein bombshell at explosive House hearing

Post author By Mike Nova
Post date August 23, 2026

FBI chief Kash Patel stunned lawmakers at a Congressional hearing after dropping explosive claims about the Jeffrey Epstein case. A heated exchange erupted as Rep. Jamie Raskin pressed Kash Patel on his past comments demanding the immediate release of Jeffrey Epstein’s client list. Raskin played Patel’s previous remarks, where he claimed the FBI director had ‘direct control’ of Epstein’s black book, and demanded to know why the names of Epstein’s co-conspirators in human trafficking have not been made public. Watch the Full confrontation and reaction from lawmakers as tensions flare on Capitol Hill.

#kashpatel #epsteinfiles #jeffreyepstein #fbihearing #congresshearing #breakingnews #uspolitics #capitolhill #jamieraskin #epsteinlist #humantrafficking #trumpnews #politicalshowdown #worldnews #justicesystem

► Subscribe to The Economic Times for the latest video updates. It’s free! – https://www.youtube.com/TheEconomicTimes?sub_confirmation=1

► More Videos @ ETTV – https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/TV

► https://EconomicTimes.com

► For business news on the go, download ET app:
https://etapp.onelink.me/tOvY/EconomicTimesApp

Follow ET on:

► Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/EconomicTimes
► Twitter – https://www.twitter.com/economictimes
► LinkedIn – https://www.linkedin.com/company/economictimes
► Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/economictimes/
► Flipboard – https://flipboard.com/@economictimes

#news #latestnews #economictimes #ET #TheEconomicTimes #businessnews

Putin and Putinism

TradingView — Global Markets, Watchlists and Screeners

Post author By Mike Nova
Post date August 23, 2026

TradingView aggregates market data across 100 exchanges — stock screeners, forex heatmaps and crypto watchlists sync across desktop, mobile and web.

Weapons for Ukraine

Military Summary: ‼️🇺🇦💸 A $27 billion hole has appeared in the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense budget — Zelenskyy Zelenskyy confirmed that a significant portion of the funds planned for the second half of the year was spent in the first half of the year, allegedly on drone production and other

Post author By Mike Nova
Post date August 23, 2026

‼️🇺🇦💸 A $27 billion hole has appeared in the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense budget — Zelenskyy

Zelenskyy confirmed that a significant portion of the funds planned for the second half of the year was spent in the first half of the year, allegedly on drone production and other

My Opinion – The News And Times

Ukraine’s New Missile Defense Strategy

Post author By Mike Nova
Post date August 23, 2026

Ukraine’s New Missile Defense Strategy

As of August 2026, Ukraine is undergoing a major pivot in its missile defense strategy. Driven by plummeting interception rates and dwindling Western stockpiles of high-end interceptors, Kyiv has shifted from a purely reactive posture to a hybrid strategy combining preemptive “active defense” with the accelerated development of sovereign and pan-European anti-ballistic architectures.

Here is an analysis of Ukraine’s new strategic framework, along with expert assessments and predictions for the 2026–2027 timeline.

The “Lethal Math” Forcing the Shift

The catalyst for this new strategy is a severe disparity in production and interception mathematics.

According to recent analyses, Russia has significantly ramped up its ballistic missile production, currently holding around 600 to 630 in reserve and aiming to produce up to 1,300 annually (roughly 100 per month). Simultaneously, Ukraine’s stocks of Patriot (PAC-2/PAC-3) interceptors have run dangerously low. As a result, the interception rate for Russian ballistic missiles has dropped dramatically to just 10.2% in 2026, down over 200% from the war’s outset.

To survive, Ukraine cannot afford to simply wait and shoot down incoming fire.

Three Pillars of the New Strategy

1. Active Defense: “Hunting the Launchers”

Instead of relying on scarce interceptors to shoot down missiles mid-air, Ukraine has initiated a new operational phase focused on preemptively destroying the launch platforms themselves.

The Tactic: Utilizing deep-strike capabilities and expanded intelligence sharing, Ukrainian forces are actively hunting Russian mobile erector-launchers (like the Iskander systems) positioned in border regions such as Bryansk and Kursk.
Recent Success: On August 22, 2026, President Zelenskyy confirmed a successful strike on an Iskander launcher, validating this “active defense” doctrine aimed at disrupting large-scale Russian salvos before they are fired.

2. Project FREYJA: A Sovereign European Shield

Recognizing that reliance on non-European (primarily US) systems is a critical vulnerability, Ukraine is spearheading Project FREYJA, formally launched in Paris in July 2026.

The Coalition: The initiative includes 10 European nations (including the UK, France, Germany, and Sweden), with Ukraine acting as the system integrator.
The Goal: The coalition aims to bypass operational bottlenecks—such as microelectronic supply chain issues—to build a pan-European, multilayered anti-ballistic missile architecture. A working prototype of the FREYJA interceptor shield is targeted for the first half of 2027.

3. Domestic Production & Bridging the Gap

While FREYJA develops, Ukraine is bridging its immediate vulnerabilities through a mix of domestic manufacturing and stopgap European procurement:

Domestic Ballistics: Ukraine has accelerated its native defense-tech sector (working with clusters like Brave1), aiming to roll out its own domestic anti-ballistic systems and ballistic capabilities by 2026–2027.
European Procurement: To cover the immediate shortfall, Ukraine recently secured an agreement with Germany for 600 PAC-2 missiles to be delivered across 2027–2028, and expects new radar systems and a SAMP/T battery from France this fall.

Assessments and Predictions for 2026–2027

1. A Vulnerable Winter Ahead

Despite the strategic shift, the winter of 2026–2027 is predicted to be exceptionally difficult. Ukraine’s energy infrastructure has been heavily degraded, and spare equipment is finite. Because FREYJA and domestic anti-ballistic systems will not yield operational results until mid-to-late 2027, Russia will likely exploit the current 10% interception rate to continue pounding power grids and logistical nodes.

2. Escalation of Deep-Strike Warfare

Analysts predict the war will move further away from massive mechanized land maneuvers and heavily toward deep-strike warfare. Ukraine will increasingly use AI-guided drone swarms, cyber warfare, and long-range strikes to hold Russian oil, gas, and military manufacturing facilities at risk. This asymmetric pressure is intended to force Moscow to pull air defenses deeper into Russian territory, thereby easing the pressure on the frontline.

3. Integration into the European Defense Base

By 2027, Ukraine is predicted to fundamentally shift its defense posture away from US dependency. Through Project FREYJA and licenses to manufacture French and other European weaponry domestically, Ukraine is positioning itself as the central testing ground and manufacturer for Europe’s next generation of continental air defense.

–

Ukraine has recently shifted its defensive tactics toward directly hunting down and destroying Russian ballistic missile launchers, rather than solely relying on intercepting the missiles in the air. This shift is primarily driven by a shortage of air defense interceptors, such as Patriot missiles, and an unprecedented surge in Russian ballistic missile attacks.

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy confirmed this approach on August 22, 2026, following a successful strike on a Russian Iskander launcher near the border.

The “Archer vs. Arrow” Strategy

Military analysts describe this approach using an “archer and arrow” analogy: instead of expending limited, expensive interceptor missiles to shoot down every incoming “arrow” (the missile), it is more effective to destroy the “archer” (the mobile launcher) before it can fire.

Here is a breakdown of why this strategy has been implemented and how it works:

Interceptor Shortages: Ukraine is facing a severe shortage of Western-supplied anti-ballistic missile systems, making it difficult to maintain a purely defensive posture against incoming strikes.
Record Attacks: Russia launched nearly 200 ballistic missiles (including S-400s, Zircons, and Oniks) at Ukraine in July 2026 alone—the highest monthly total since the full-scale invasion began.
Targeting Mobile Launchers: Russia relies on an estimated 100 to 150 mobile launch units for these strikes. By systematically hunting down these specific vehicles, Ukraine aims to permanently degrade Russia’s capacity to launch mass barrages.
Deep Strike Capabilities: To execute this, Ukraine is utilizing complex strike operations, which include the use of advanced kamikaze drones capable of striking targets deep inside Russian territory or near the border. There are also ongoing discussions about equipping long-range drones with Starlink for better navigation and control during these specific hunt-and-destroy missions.

Zelenskyy has described this effort as a “separate, more difficult tactic” and a dedicated operation that the Ukrainian Defense Forces are actively prioritizing to protect strategic infrastructure.

–

Links

Ukraine’s New Missile Defense Strategy https://share.gemini.google/lIySop1t6s3p

Ukraine’s New Missile Defense Strategy https://share.gemini.google/vlsOfY8EK8Fw

–

The News And Times Blog

Ukraine’s New Missile Defense Strategy

Post author By Mike Nova
Post date August 23, 2026

Ukraine’s New Missile Defense Strategy

Here is an analysis of Ukraine’s new strategic framework, along with expert assessments and predictions for the 2026–2027 timeline.

The “Lethal Math” Forcing the Shift

The catalyst for this new strategy is a severe disparity in production and interception mathematics.

To survive, Ukraine cannot afford to simply wait and shoot down incoming fire.

Three Pillars of the New Strategy

1. Active Defense: “Hunting the Launchers”

Instead of relying on scarce interceptors to shoot down missiles mid-air, Ukraine has initiated a new operational phase focused on preemptively destroying the launch platforms themselves.

The Tactic: Utilizing deep-strike capabilities and expanded intelligence sharing, Ukrainian forces are actively hunting Russian mobile erector-launchers (like the Iskander systems) positioned in border regions such as Bryansk and Kursk.
Recent Success: On August 22, 2026, President Zelenskyy confirmed a successful strike on an Iskander launcher, validating this “active defense” doctrine aimed at disrupting large-scale Russian salvos before they are fired.

2. Project FREYJA: A Sovereign European Shield

Recognizing that reliance on non-European (primarily US) systems is a critical vulnerability, Ukraine is spearheading Project FREYJA, formally launched in Paris in July 2026.

The Coalition: The initiative includes 10 European nations (including the UK, France, Germany, and Sweden), with Ukraine acting as the system integrator.
The Goal: The coalition aims to bypass operational bottlenecks—such as microelectronic supply chain issues—to build a pan-European, multilayered anti-ballistic missile architecture. A working prototype of the FREYJA interceptor shield is targeted for the first half of 2027.

3. Domestic Production & Bridging the Gap

While FREYJA develops, Ukraine is bridging its immediate vulnerabilities through a mix of domestic manufacturing and stopgap European procurement:

Domestic Ballistics: Ukraine has accelerated its native defense-tech sector (working with clusters like Brave1), aiming to roll out its own domestic anti-ballistic systems and ballistic capabilities by 2026–2027.
European Procurement: To cover the immediate shortfall, Ukraine recently secured an agreement with Germany for 600 PAC-2 missiles to be delivered across 2027–2028, and expects new radar systems and a SAMP/T battery from France this fall.

Assessments and Predictions for 2026–2027

1. A Vulnerable Winter Ahead

2. Escalation of Deep-Strike Warfare

3. Integration into the European Defense Base

–

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy confirmed this approach on August 22, 2026, following a successful strike on a Russian Iskander launcher near the border.

The “Archer vs. Arrow” Strategy

Here is a breakdown of why this strategy has been implemented and how it works:

Interceptor Shortages: Ukraine is facing a severe shortage of Western-supplied anti-ballistic missile systems, making it difficult to maintain a purely defensive posture against incoming strikes.
Record Attacks: Russia launched nearly 200 ballistic missiles (including S-400s, Zircons, and Oniks) at Ukraine in July 2026 alone—the highest monthly total since the full-scale invasion began.
Targeting Mobile Launchers: Russia relies on an estimated 100 to 150 mobile launch units for these strikes. By systematically hunting down these specific vehicles, Ukraine aims to permanently degrade Russia’s capacity to launch mass barrages.
Deep Strike Capabilities: To execute this, Ukraine is utilizing complex strike operations, which include the use of advanced kamikaze drones capable of striking targets deep inside Russian territory or near the border. There are also ongoing discussions about equipping long-range drones with Starlink for better navigation and control during these specific hunt-and-destroy missions.