This is total nonsense. Europe is paying Russia more for hydrocarbon energy than they are giving Ukraine in military aid. Russia’s weapons manufacturing capacity far exceeds that of NATO. the Oreshnik missile they fired on Ukraine has capabilities that far exceed anything we have
— Thegreat Cornholeo (@TCornholeo64162) February 28, 2025
Day: February 27, 2025
“What is so wrong with not wanting to send Americans to fight a war that produces nothing but bodies for caskets?”
Nothing. That’s the whole point. All Ukraine wanted was NATO weapons to stand up to an invasion, and didn’t ask for a single U.S. soldier for support.
— Greg Doheny (@DohenyGreg) February 28, 2025
Zelensky demands that Ukraine receive $250 billion from Russian assets for weapons purchases
— Jerry Lee (@planet_condor) February 28, 2025
Are you going to buy Nuclear weapons for Ukraine from England or France?
— Rick Erram (@ErramRick) February 28, 2025
Are you going to buy Nuclear weapons for Ukraine from England or France?
— Rick Erram (@ErramRick) February 28, 2025
The minerals deal creates a mechanism to
repay the #UnitedStates for
THE WEAPONS WE HAVE GIVEN #Ukraine
OVER THE PAST THREE YEARS,
BUT NOT for Ukraine to buy weapons in the future@washingtonpost 27/2-25#UkraineWar #NoFlyZone #AirCampaign#Trump #AlCapone #MineralAgreement— Den Politiske Hveps (@PolitiskeHveps) February 28, 2025
The minerals deal creates a mechanism to
repay the #UnitedStates for
THE WEAPONS WE HAVE GIVEN #Ukraine
OVER THE PAST THREE YEARS,
BUT NOT for Ukraine to buy weapons in the future@washingtonpost 27/2-25#UkraineWar #NoFlyZone #AirCampaign#Trump #AlCapone #MineralAgreement— Den Politiske Hveps (@PolitiskeHveps) February 28, 2025
So the guy winning the war who can take the mineral & oil fields in eastern Ukraine regardless of u.s weapons is going to stop his push for the deposits, that would theoretically give the U.S a reason to intervene in Ukraine?
— Nicholas Schneider (@FCBayernfan95) February 28, 2025
